RAM PRODUCTIONS INTERNATIONAL
  • Home
  • How We Can Work Together
  • About Michael Russnow
  • Actor/Personality
    • Sample Reel
    • 2014 Sample Reel
    • Michael Russnow Does Stand-Up
    • Water Into Wine
    • The Time Tree - Older Alex
    • Actor's Slate - One Minute Version
    • Actor's Slate - Four Minute Version
    • Interview on Stanley Dyrector Show - Part One
    • Interview on Stanley Dyrector Show - Part Two
    • Interview on Stanley Dyrector Show - Part Three
    • Interview on Stanley Dyrector Show - Part Four
    • Michael Russnow Speaks Out Episode 1
    • Michael Russnow Speaks Out! - Episode 2
    • Commentators Shouldn't Say Trump Has Pulse of America
  • Huffington Post Articles
    • Business >
      • Abolish Tipping
      • AIG Reverse Stock Split
      • AIG Plummets: Stock Split
      • Asus Computers
      • AT&T Doesn't Communicate
      • Bernard Madoff Swindled Everyone
      • Citigroup Reverse Split
      • Citigroup to Reverse Split
      • Horrible Banking Experiences
      • Is Shelly Sterling Channeling Lurleen Wallace?
      • Los Angeles Parking Meter Signs
      • My GE Dishwasher Tragedy
      • State Controller Has Your Money Available
      • Windows 7 Not As Great As Advertised
      • You Can't Feed Parking Meters
    • Media >
      • Abolish the Electoral College
      • BP Chairman Choice of Words
      • British Nurse Suicide Overblown By Media
      • Ed McMahon's Money Problems
      • Is Media Keeping Trump Alive
      • Los Angeles Times Backtracks on TV Grid
      • Lou Dobbs and His Ilk are Wrong
      • Media Downplays Hillary 3 Million Victory
      • Media Headline Biases
      • Media Inflames Comey Letter Re Hillary
      • Media Mischaracterizes GOP Win
      • Media Props Trump Up, Even When Hillary Wins Debate
      • Media Says Hillary's Not Transparent
      • Media Scare Tactics
      • Media Sensationalizes Obamacare Premium Rise
      • Memo to the Media: Maybe It's Time For a "Spartacus" Moment
      • Obama Asks Pundits Not to Skew Words
      • Obama Gym Workout No Big Deal
      • Obama Promised Change - From Bush and Cheney
      • Obama Would Be Citizen, Even if Born in Kenya
      • Palin Accuses Letterman of Seeking PR
      • What's Happened to the LA Times?
      • White House Gate Crashers
      • Why Does Trump Get More Face Time Than Hillary?
      • Why Media Normalizes Trump
    • Politics >
      • 2012 Iowa Caucuses: Shakespeare Was Right About the Masses
      • 2012 Vice Presidential Debate: Biden Blew Ryan Away
      • 25th Amendment Might Rid Us of Trump
      • Calling for Al Gore
      • Debate 2: Hillary Held Firm, While Trump Lied
      • Donald Trump Comportment: When is Enough Enough?
      • Donald Trump Supporters Are Deplorable
      • Donald Trump Supporters Must Be Stupid
      • Electoral College Support Because Founders Created it
      • Europeans are for Obama
      • French Choose President By CItizenry
      • GOP Senators Continue to Support Trump
      • Has Hillary Given Up in South Dakota?
      • Hillary Beat Trump in Popular Vote
      • James Comey, Legal Moralist or Fool?
      • John McCain No Longer a Hero
      • McCain's Nervous Breakdown
      • McCain/Palin Debate Spin
      • McCain Pulls Out the Heartstrings
      • Obama Accepts Super PAC Money
      • Obama & Clinton Forces, Can't We Get Along?
      • Obama Becoming First Wimp
      • Obama's Decision to Go to Copenhagen
      • Obama First 2012 Debate: Gotta Do Better
      • Obama Has Every Right to Replace Scalia
      • Obama: It's Time to Play Hardball
      • Obama Must Stop Postponing Health Care Law
      • Obama Needs Marc Antony to Get it Right
      • Obama Nobel Peace Prize
      • Obama Second 2012 Debate: Romney Overmatched
      • Obama Third 2012 Debate: He Gives Romney Presidential Seminar
      • Obama Won, But GOP Doesn't Seem to Recognize it
      • Patriotism Not a Republican Virtue
      • Pence Won Debate, Not By Much
      • Political Leaders and Journalists MUST Discuss Popular Presidential Vote
      • Politician/Media Rarely Discuss Americans Preferred Hillary
      • Popular Vote Must Choose Presidency
      • Primary Ballots For Party Members Only
      • Proposition 8 Backlash
      • Redo in Michigan and Florida
      • Religion in Politics
      • Romney Acceptance Speech
      • Rudy Giuliani's Screaming Convention Tirade
      • Ruth Bader Ginsurb's Contempt for Donald Trump
      • Sarah Palin's Appeal is That She's Annie Oakley
      • Sarah Palin's a Right-Wing Gidget
      • Sarah Palin, A Stepford Wife
      • Sarah Palin Is No Dan Quayle
      • Scalia Should Recuse on Gay Issues
      • Senate Refusal to Vote on Scalia Replacement a Sham
      • Should Anthony Weiner Resign?
      • Super Delegates Caved to Obama
      • Trump Is No Populist
      • Trump Name Calling: Why Hasn't it Backfired?
      • Trump Paris Pull-Out, Time To Elect Popular Vote President
      • Trump Performance as President Might Be Best Solution to Change Presidential Election System
      • Trump's Problems Aren't Going Away
      • We've Finally Got Health Care
      • When Does Political Correctness Go Too Far?
      • Will Hillary Have Last Laugh?
    • Show Business >
      • Movies >
        • A Most Violent Year
        • Black Swan a Must See
        • Boyhood: An Engaging Film
        • Che The Movie
        • Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino
        • The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
        • Deborah Kerr, Rhymes With Star
        • Defiance
        • The Fighter
        • Good
        • The Hateful Eight Bloated But Intriguing
        • Honorary Academy Awards Ceremony a Travesty
        • Inception
        • Jackie Chan Should Not Get an Oscar
        • Leonardo DiCaprio Deserves the Oscar for "Wolf of Wall Street"
        • Michael Moore"s Where to Invade Next: Documentary or Propaganda?
        • Minority Report and the Oscar Controversy
        • Mitch Reinholt of American Teen
        • Movie Theatre Etiquette
        • Nicholas Hoult of A Single Man
        • Jackie Chan Gets an Oscar?
        • Quentin Tarantino Afraid Aging Will Make Him Out of Touch
        • The Reader
        • Revolutionary Road
        • Seven Pounds
        • Texting in Theatres Is A Blight
      • Television >
        • The Amazing Race
        • Big Brother: Danielle's Stupid Decision
        • Big Brother: Frank Eudy's Ouster
        • Celebrity Apprentice 2011
        • Charlie Sheen's Rant
        • Conan O'Brien's Pissed
        • David Letterman's Apology to Palin
        • David Letterman Gag Didn't Work
        • Do We Need Intrusive Network Logos
        • Glee Message of Tolerance Misguided
        • Golden Globes 2010
        • Golden Globes 2011
        • Golden Globes 2012
        • Golden Globes 2016
        • Hell's Kitchen's Gordon Ramsay
        • I Can Die Now, I've Met Betty White
        • Lost Finale
        • NBC's Decision to Bring Back Leno
        • Political Correctness on TV
        • Racial Advancement on TV
        • Survivor Caramoan: Why Was Erik Reichenbach Ignored by Jeff Probst?
        • Survivor Nicaragua 2010
        • Survivor Redemption Island 2011
        • Survivor: Samoa 2009
        • Susan Boyle I
        • Susan Boyle II
        • Susan Boyle III - The Finals
        • The Amazing Race: Amazing that Brooke and Scott Made the Top 3
        • The Emmy Awards 2014
        • The Oscars 2010
        • The Oscars 2011
        • The Oscars 2012
        • The Oscars 2013
        • The Oscars 2013 Afterthought: Why MacFarlane's Lincoln Joke Didn't Work
        • The Oscars 2014
        • The Oscars 2015
        • The Oscars 2016
        • The Oscars 2017
        • TV Cops Get Away With Murder
        • TV Shows and Films Shouldn't Screw Talent
        • Young Actors in TV Roles
      • Book of Oded Review
      • Chekhov Alive in Hollywood
      • Cutting Meat in Movies and TV Shows
      • Hal Kanter Memories
      • I Never Cried For My Father
      • Perceptionism is the worst "ism"
      • Robert Anderson Has Died
      • SAG Actors Must Remain Strong
      • SAG Negotiations Marred by Clooney and Hanks
      • Ted Lange's Lady Patriot Onstage
      • Trump Bails Out Ed McMahon
      • WGA Strike For Dummies I
      • WGA Strike For Dummies II
      • WGA Strike For Dummies III
      • WGA Strike For Dummies IV
    • Travel >
      • Airline Fees Are Chintzy
      • Airline Service Is a Sham
      • Bitching Can Be Effective
      • Morocco Can Be Intriguing
      • Volcano in Iceland
    • It's Not Easy to Become a Juror
  • My Novel
  • LA Fitness Has Terrible Customer Service
  • Political Correctness Should Be Challenged
    • Contact
  • Sarah Palin Says She's Not Responsible
  • Remedies When You've Been Cheated
  • The Iguassu Falls
  • Getting to Rio
  • Rio de Janeiro
  • São Paulo
  • London Film Award Certificate


​
AIG PROPOSED REVERSE STOCK SPLIT

Shareholders Should Vote This Down as a No-Brainer

 

Picture
                                                                                                                The Huffington Post, June 27, 2009


As I mentioned in another article, I returned to the stock market in March after a long absence to take advantage of the
very low stock prices of large companies.  So far so good with my choices, Citigroup and AIG, as both have produced good results.  In spite of the dire warnings of stress tests and the difficulties these and other financial institutions have endured
during the financial crisis, in less than two months I doubled my money.

The market turned around somewhat and the stocks went down in the last month, but nowhere near where they were when I bought them, so I'm still making 50% on my investment after only three months.

I figured that with these two giants and with the money the government loaned them in the Stimulus Package to avoid bankruptcy, that they'd eventually move back up considerably from the low to high one dollar range at which I bought them.  In particular, because Citi was selling for $27 last year and $56 the year before, and AIG had a price of $31 last year and over $70 a couple of years ago.  Slow and steady, the economy is improving and with patience I think I'll be proven right.

However, my beef with AIG is with the recent proxy statement they sent through my broker for the Stockholders Meeting
this coming Tuesday, June 30, wherein, among other things, they want to do a reverse stock split of 1:20, meaning that
if you had 1,000 shares you'll wind up with fifty.  If you had ten thousand shares you'll have 500.  They will initially multiply
the share value by a like amount, so you won't lose any equity, but your chances of growing your investment have become pretty slim.

The insurance company's rationale is that, because their stock is valued so low -- it just sold for $1.46 -- it has lost institutional investors, many of which will not buy a stock that is priced under five dollars.  But worst, they ominously warn, if the stock falls below a dollar as it did up until a couple of months ago, the New York Stock Exchange may delist them.  The fact that the
stock rose to over two dollars and has never declined below the mid one dollar range in over two months would appear to
make this concern overstated.

However, what mostly bothers me as a small-time investor is that by reducing the number of shares by one twentieth,
if the company prospers to a much higher level of equity, the shareholders will not see their investments grow nearly
as much because the increases of the share prices would have to rise at astronomical rates per day or week to effect the
same profit margin.  For example, if -- to round things out -- the share numbers are cut by twenty, they will raise the price from
$1.50 to $30.  It is much more reasonable to expect that the $1.50 might rise to, let's say $20 eventually -- considering the heights from which it previously fell -- than for a $30 stock to get to $600 a share, which it would have to achieve for someone with fifty shares to reap the same results as the person who originally had one thousand shares if the stock climbs to $20.

Plus, with an inflated price of $30 and considering the recent economic struggles of AIG, how many institutional brokers
are going to want to pay that much for a company not yet back on sound footing?  What I find interesting is that, in the
proxy statement, the Board of Directors does not warn against this risk.  They only tell you the reasons they want to
reverse split the stock, and cover themselves slightly with "In addition, the reverse stock split may not increase the price
of AIG Common Stock or may not lead to a sustained increase in the price of AIG Common Stock, which would prevent
AIG from realizing some of the anticipated benefits of the reverse stock split."  Interestingly they don't spell out the real
danger, which is that the stock would now have greater room to free fall and the shareholder would have much fewer
shares to cushion the blow.

Then, to top it off, they go on -- amazingly with a bit of cheek, I think -- to say "the reverse stock split may not result in
a stock price that will attract investment funds or institutional investors or satisfy the investment guidelines of investment
funds or institutional investors."  But wasn't that one of their prime enticements to do this? Is this a shell game they're
putting before us?

Not to mention another desired goal is to increase the potential or "authorized" shares of common stock by another
five billion or so, which, if ultimately sanctioned by the Board, would dilute everyone's shares still further.

And, as stated, the Board of Directors doesn't at all address the realities as stated above that the gross reduction in
shares for each stockholder provides much fewer possibilities for upward movement each day.  Wells Fargo which sells
at the mid-twenty dollar range only went up 7 cents today.  AIG and Citigroup have done that many times and more from
a vantage point of $1.50 and $3.00.  IBM, which sells for $105 went down 38 cents today.  Sometimes it shoots up or goes
down a few dollars, but my point is that the market is such that the movement of a stock suddenly priced at thirty dollars
is not going to generally move up and down proportionally to its previous price, and with fewer shares you have much
less room to grow.

I bought AIG at $1.15 and within a month it shot up to over $2 -- that's almost double.  How fast do you think AIG will go
from $30 to $60, barring an amazing stock story?  And yet the Board of Directors, who will probably win this fight, because
there were no opposing statements on the Proxy Ballot and no negative publicity on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News, MSNBC, The Today Show, Facebook, You Tube, Twitter or anywhere in the press that I've seen, will have achieved a
sleight of hand, which will not only hurt me but, much worse, the many stock holders who bought the stock at much
higher rates before it plummeted.

Those folks, who bought AIG at fifty bucks or seventy bucks and had a few thousand shares or so, then saw the price
go below a dollar, have held on and continue to hope for some sort of a recovery.  What chance do they have if their
10,000 shares are reduced to only five hundred?

If anyone has AIG stock and has not yet voted or has a chance to do so, I would absolutely urge them to vote this
reverse stock split down and also the attempt to issue five billion more common shares.  But remember the proxy has
to be voted before 11:59 p.m. Monday night, June 29.

For the future, I'd suggest that if some kind of a reverse split is necessary to ensure NYSE listing that it be limited to
1:3 or 1:4 to get the price over the five dollars needed to lure institutional funds back into play.  This 1:20 split
smells -- to me -- a bit too rancid for the ordinary shareholders, not to mention the U.S. public who are hoping to
recover their investment.
 
                                                      Follow Michael Russnow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kerrloy

                                                                                                                                                                Contact Us

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.